K-numberK254183
Device nameMR Conditional Cup Electrodes
ApplicantTechnomed Europe
Product codeGXY
Device classClass II
Decision dateMay 7, 2026
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation882.1320
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The MR Conditional Cup Electrodes are cutaneous electrodes consisting of a 10mm ABS disc coated with silver/silver chloride, attached to a conductive lead wire terminating in a connector. They are used for recording electroencephalograms (EEG), evoked potentials (EP), or as ground/reference electrodes. The device is non-sterile, single-patient-use only, and can remain on the patient during MRI or CT scans under specific conditions.

Technological characteristics

The subject device uses a conductive carbon fiber cable with PVC coating (versus tin-plated copper in the primary predicate), has lead wire lengths of 19.5cm for arrays and 28.2cm for singles, maximum resistance <40Ω for singles and <30Ω for arrays, impedance <500Ω, and supports 2–40 electrodes (up to 10 per array). It is MR conditional at 1.5T and 3.0T with specific SAR and gradient limits. These characteristics are identical or equivalent to the predicate devices in terms of safety and effectiveness.

Test standards cited

IEC 60601-1 Clause 8.5.2.3 (electrical safety); ISO 10993-1:2018 (biocompatibility for surface devices >24 hours to ≤30 days); ASTM standards for MR image artifact, magnetically induced displacement force, and magnetically induced torque; ISO/TS 10974 (RF-induced and gradient-induced heating).

Substantial equivalence argument

The MR Conditional Cup Electrodes are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices because they share identical intended use (EEG/EP recording), classification (21 CFR 882.1320, Class II, product code GXY), materials (ABS 20% glass-filled with Ag/AgCl coating), design (10mm cup electrodes with lead wires and connectors), and MR/CT conditional specifications. Performance testing demonstrates equivalence in functionality, safety, and effectiveness, and no new safety concerns were identified.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →