K-numberK254170
Device namePercutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) Kit
ApplicantDegania Silicone , Ltd.
Product codePIF
Device classClass II
Decision dateMar 20, 2026
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation876.5980
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Degania Silicone Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) Kit is a single-use, sterile, disposable kit for placing a feeding tube directly into the stomach via minimally invasive endoscopy. It provides enteral nutrition and medication delivery to adult patients unable to maintain adequate oral intake, and includes a silicone feeding catheter, two-way ENFit connector, external retention device, and placement tools.

Technological characteristics

The device is silicone-based, sterile, and single-use, designed for Push or Pull placement methods in two French sizes (20 Fr and 24 Fr). Key differences from the predicate are: an ENFit-only connector compliant with ISO 80369-3 (instead of optional non-ENFit connectors), and a simplified external retention device design with silicone bolster and clamp instead of a twist-lock and cable tie. The device shares the same principle of operation, materials, dimensions, and method of insertion as the predicate.

Test standards cited

ISO 14971 (risk management), ISO 10993-1 and FDA guidance (biocompatibility including cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation, systemic toxicity, pyrogenicity, implantation, genotoxicity), ISO 11135 and ISO 10993-7 (sterilization and residuals), ISO 11607-1 and 11607-2 (packaging validation), ASTM D4169, F1886, F88/F88M, F1929, F2098 (transportation and distribution), ASTM F640 (X-ray detectability), ISO 20695 (enteral feeding systems), ISO 80369-3 and ISO 18250-3 (ENFit connectors), and ASTM F2503-20 (MRI safety).

Substantial equivalence argument

The Degania Silicone PEG Kit is substantially equivalent to the Entuit PEG predicate (K213356) because both are silicone-based, sterile, single-use systems for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy using Push or Pull techniques, with identical fundamental technological characteristics, materials, dimensions, and principle of operation. The minor technological differences (ENFit-only connector and simplified external retention design) align with current international safety standards and do not raise new safety or effectiveness questions. Nonclinical testing demonstrates the device meets all applicable consensus standards and performs equivalently to the predicate.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →