K-numberK254099
Device nameEVO Q30 Diagnostic Ultrasound System; EVO Q20 Diagnostic Ultrasound System; EVO Q10 Diagnostic Ultrasound System; EVO XQ30 Diagnostic Ultrasound System; EVO XQ20 Diagnostic Ultrasound System; EVO XQ10 Diagnostic Ultrasound System; EVO QH30 Diagnostic Ultrasound System; EVO QH20 Diagnostic Ultrasound System; EVO QH10 Diagnostic Ultrasound System
ApplicantSamsung Medison Co., Ltd.
Product codeIYN
Device classClass II
Decision dateMar 27, 2026
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation892.1550
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The EVO Q30, Q20, Q10, XQ30, XQ20, XQ10, QH30, QH20, and QH10 are portable/mobile diagnostic ultrasound systems designed to acquire and display ultrasound images in multiple modes (2D, Doppler, M-mode, 3D/4D, etc.) for clinical diagnosis across diverse applications including fetal, abdominal, cardiac, pediatric, and vascular imaging. These are prescription devices intended for use by qualified healthcare professionals in hospitals, clinics, and private practices.

Technological characteristics

The proposed devices employ the same fundamental ultrasound technology as the predicate HM70 EVO system. Key additions include: intra-operative and thoracic clinical applications, MV-Flow mode, multiple transmit channels, new accessories (Video Output Device, Pencil Gender, WLAN Adapter), new software features (IDEA, IETA, EzPictogram, Voice Command, EzGuide, EzDiagram, MirrorTouch, TouchSign), seven new probes, and WLAN support with Wi-Fi and Bluetooth modules.

Test standards cited

The devices comply with IEC 60601-1 (general safety), IEC 60601-1-2 (electromagnetic disturbances), IEC 60601-2-37 (ultrasonic diagnostic equipment), IEC 60601-2-18 (endoscopic equipment), ISO 10993-1 (biocompatibility), ISO 14971 (risk management), and NEMA UD 2-2004 (acoustic output measurement).

Substantial equivalence argument

The proposed EVO systems are substantially equivalent to the predicate HM70 EVO because they share identical intended use (diagnostic ultrasound imaging and fluid analysis), employ the same fundamental scientific technology, have comparable safety/effectiveness supported by non-clinical testing, and maintain equivalent measurement and reporting capabilities. New features and probes do not alter the fundamental safety or effectiveness profile compared to the predicate.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →