K-numberK254004
Device nameVRNT
ApplicantCognifisense, Inc.
Product codeQRA
Device classClass II
Decision dateApr 10, 2026
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation890.5800
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

VRNT is a prescription-use immersive virtual reality system that delivers cognitive behavioral therapy and evidence-based behavioral methods to patients aged 18 and older with chronic lower back pain (moderate to severe, lasting longer than three months). The device is intended for in-home use over an 8-week program (5 days/week, 40 sessions of 7-27 minutes each) to reduce pain and pain interference.

Technological characteristics

The subject device (VRNT v2.5) uses Meta Quest 3S VR headset hardware with dual LCD displays (2064×2208 pixels per eye), ~110° horizontal field of view, 6 degrees of freedom, and inside-out optical tracking. The predicate device (VRNT v2.24) used Samsung Gear VRx with a Samsung Galaxy S9. Both use the same therapeutic software content and HTC Vive for onboarding. The hardware differs but provides equivalent functionality, immersion, and performance for therapy delivery.

Test standards cited

Risk management activities were conducted in accordance with ISO 14971. Software development followed ISO 13485 clauses 7.3 (design controls), 8.3 (nonconforming product), and 8.5 (corrective and preventative action). Design verification and validation included comprehensive end-to-end functional testing, traceability analysis, anomaly reporting, and hazard analysis for software risks.

Substantial equivalence argument

The subject device has identical indications for use, intended use, and principles of operation as the predicate device. Both use virtual reality to deliver behavioral-based treatment targeting chronic lower back pain through CBT and evidence-based methods. Although the VR hardware differs (Meta Quest 3S vs. Samsung Gear VRx), each hardware set provides equivalent functionality and immersion necessary for therapy. Design verification and validation testing confirmed all control measures are as effective as the predicate. Therefore, the technological differences do not raise different questions of safety or effectiveness.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →