K-numberK253936
Device namePower Mobility Scooter (MJMA01, MJMA02)
ApplicantNanjing Mijo Technology Co., Ltd.
Product codeINI
Device classClass II
Decision dateMar 12, 2026
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation890.3800
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Power Mobility Scooter (MJMA01, MJMA02) is a motor-driven, battery-powered four-wheeled vehicle designed for indoor and outdoor transportation to provide mobility to disabled or elderly persons limited to a seated position. The device has a maximum loading capacity of 120 kg and includes features such as electromagnetic brakes, a lithium-ion battery with off-board charger, seat with back support, and anti-tip devices. MJMA01 lacks armrests while MJMA02 is equipped with armrests—the only difference between the two models.

Technological characteristics

The subject device uses an aluminum alloy frame versus the predicate's steel frame, weighs 29–31 kg versus 42 kg, and has a slightly higher motor output (24 V 250W versus 24 V 180W). It uses a lithium-ion battery (24V 5.8Ah×2) instead of lead-acid (12V 12Ah×2), achieves 6.84 km/h max speed versus 6 km/h, can climb a 10° slope versus 9°, and has a 16.3 km travel range versus 15 km. Overall dimensions, wheel diameters, ground clearance, turn radius, and brake characteristics are all similar.

Test standards cited

ISO 10993-5, 10993-10, 10993-23 (biocompatibility); ISO 7176-1 through 7176-25 (wheelchairs and powered scooters—stability, braking, energy, dimensions, strength, climatic, obstacles, EMC, batteries); ISO 16840-10 (ignition resistance); IEC 60601-1-2:2014+A1:2020 (electromagnetic disturbances).

Substantial equivalence argument

The proposed device is substantially equivalent because it has the same intended use, drive system, braking mechanism, and operating environment as the predicate device. Although there are minor differences in frame material, weight, battery type, and performance parameters (speed, slope, range), all differences have been tested according to ISO 7176 series standards and meet design specifications. The test data support that these differences do not deleteriously affect safety or effectiveness, and the device performs the same function as the predicate.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →