Harrison-AI Medical Pty, Ltd. · Class II · Cleared Mar 3, 2026
| K-number | K253818 |
| Device name | Annalise Enterprise |
| Applicant | Harrison-AI Medical Pty, Ltd. |
| Product code | QAS |
| Device class | Class II |
| Decision date | Mar 3, 2026 |
| Decision | Substantially Equivalent |
| Regulation | 892.2080 |
Annalise Enterprise is an AI-based software tool that analyzes non-contrast brain CT scans to identify suspected acute ischemic infarcts and prioritizes them in a clinical worklist. It interfaces with PACS/RIS systems to provide notifications to trained clinicians, enabling earlier evaluation of high-risk patients without replacing standard diagnostic interpretation or advanced imaging.
The subject device detects acute infarct across multiple cerebral territories (ACA, MCA, PCA, cerebellum, basilar, watershed) on non-contrast CT, whereas the predicate (Rapid NCCT Stroke) detects only large vessel occlusion in ICA and MCA-M1. Both use AI algorithms and operate in parallel to clinical workflow; performance differs with subject achieving 84.5–89.2% sensitivity and 84.1–93.1% specificity across operating points, compared to predicate's 63.5% sensitivity and 95.1% specificity.
ISO 13485 (QMS), ISO 14971 (risk management), IEC 62304 (software lifecycle), IEC 62366-1 (usability), AAMI TIR 57 (cybersecurity), ISO/IEC 27001 (information security), IEC 82304-1 (health software), DICOM (imaging standard), and FDA guidance on software submissions (2023) and CAD devices (2022).
Although the subject device detects acute infarct across broader territories than the predicate's LVO-only focus, both employ similar AI principles, operate parallel to standard care, provide worklist prioritization via PACS integration, and achieve clinically effective triage. Standalone performance testing demonstrates high sensitivity/specificity exceeding 80% at multiple operating points, comparable triage turnaround time (~82 seconds), and no new safety or effectiveness questions. The differences raise only technological—not clinical—questions and are supported by robust validation data with diverse patient demographics and equipment manufacturers.
View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov