K-numberK253091
Device nameART-Plan+ (v3.1.0)
ApplicantTherapanacea Sas
Product codeMUJ
Device classClass II
Decision dateDec 23, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation892.5050
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

ART-Plan+ (v3.1.0) is a software platform for radiotherapy treatment planning used by cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy. It includes three modules: Annotate (automatic contouring of organs and tumors on CT/MR images), SmartPlan (automatic treatment plan generation for prostate), and AdaptBox (synthetic-CT generation from CBCT, dose computation, and replanning decision support for head/neck, breast/thorax, and male pelvis anatomies). The device is intended for use by trained medical professionals in hospitals and clinics.

Technological characteristics

ART-Plan+ v3.1.0 shares core technological features with its primary predicate (ART-Plan+ v3.0.0) and reference device (ART-Plan v2.2.0): standalone software using AI-based deep learning for automated delineation, DICOM compatibility, and CBCT-based synthetic-CT generation with dose computation on CT/synthetic-CT images for photon beam external beam irradiation. Key differences from the primary predicate include the AdaptBox module (covered by reference device), addition of new anatomical structures (ribs, cauda equina, prostate CTVn), and improved SmartPlan prescription coverage for prostate.

Test standards cited

Not stated in this summary.

Substantial equivalence argument

ART-Plan+ v3.1.0 is substantially equivalent because it performs the same intended functions as the predicate devices: automatic contour generation, radiotherapy treatment plan creation, and CBCT-based adaptation decision-making using identical methodologies (AI segmentation, synthetic-CT generation, dose computation). The device was validated through non-clinical performance testing including autosegmentation DSC comparison (minimum -5% tolerance), qualitative clinician evaluation (≥85% acceptance), treatment plan quantitative/qualitative assessment (≤5% DVH difference, ≥93% clinical acceptability), and synthetic-CT dosimetric validation (≥92% 2%/2mm gamma, ≥93.57% 3%/3mm gamma). All validation tests passed acceptance criteria, demonstrating clinical acceptability equivalent to predicate devices.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →