K-numberK253053
Device nameDura-Crown (CB21-A1/CB21-A2/CB21-A3/CB21-B1)
ApplicantHangzhou SHINING3D Dental Technology Co., Ltd.
Product codeEBF
Device classClass II
Decision dateSep 23, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation872.3690
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

Dura-Crown is a liquid photocurable resin material used in combination with a SHINING3D 3D printer to fabricate dental restorations. It is indicated for both anterior and posterior indirect restorations including inlays, onlays, veneers, full crowns, bridge restorations, artificial teeth, and temporary crowns and bridges. The material is stored in 500ml HDPE bottles and undergoes layer-by-layer light curing during printing followed by post-curing in a dedicated cure device.

Technological characteristics

Dura-Crown is a methacrylate-based polymer resin produced by free radical polymerization of oligomers triggered by a photoinitiator, with fillers, additives, and pigments. It comes in four VITA-shade colors (A1, A2, A3, B1) and is non-sterile with a 2-year shelf life. The material has a flexural strength specification of ≥120 MPa compared to the predicate's ≥100 MPa. Both devices use UV light curing and require validated 3D-printer and post-curing equipment.

Test standards cited

ISO 4049:2019 (Dentistry – Polymer-based restorative materials), ISO 10477:2020 (Dentistry – Polymer-based crown and veneering materials), ISO 22112:2017 (Dentistry – Artificial teeth for dental prostheses), ISO 10993-1:2018 and ISO 7405:2018 for biocompatibility, and ASTM F1980-21 for shelf-life testing.

Substantial equivalence argument

The subject device shares identical indications for use, material type (methacrylate-based polymer), material shades, curing methodology, and performance standard requirements as the predicate device VarseoSmile TriniQ (K233596). Both are Class II tooth shade resin materials with the same product codes (EBF, EBG, PZY) and both employ the same equipment framework (validated 3D-printer and post-cure device). Minor differences in shelf life (2 vs. 3 years) and flexural strength specification (≥120 vs. ≥100 MPa) are not safety or performance concerns; the subject device's higher flexural strength and comprehensive biocompatibility testing actually exceed predicate requirements. The chemical composition is similar (oligomers, photoinitiator, fillers, additives, and pigments), and both demonstrate equivalent performance against the same ISO standards.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →