K-numberK252793
Device nameARMI® Endoscopic Video Image Processor (JY-MIP-3000); ARMI® Single-Use Hysteroscope (SH-01A, SH-02A, SH-03A, SH-04A, SH-05A, SH-01B, SH-02B, SH-03B, SH-04B, SH-01C, SH-02C, SH-03C, SH-04C)
ApplicantJiangsu Jiyuan Medical Technology Co., Ltd.
Product codeHIH
Device classClass II
Decision dateDec 18, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation884.1690
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The ARMI® Hysteroscopy System 2.0 is a hysteroscope system consisting of a reusable video image processor and single-use hysteroscope instruments in 13 different models with varying diameters, tip angles, and image resolutions (160,000 to 1,000,000 pixels). It is intended for viewing the adult cervical canal and uterine cavity to perform diagnostic and operative hysteroscopic procedures.

Technological characteristics

The subject device offers multiple models with outer diameters of 3.0–6.5 mm (versus predicate's 4.8 mm), working lengths of 245 mm (versus 200 mm), variable tip angles (0°, 15°, 18°, 22° versus predicate's 16°), and three image resolution options versus the predicate's single 160,000-pixel resolution. Both use CMOS imaging with 2 LEDs and ethylene oxide sterilization; the subject has a reusable image processor with disposable cannulae, comparable to the predicate.

Test standards cited

IEC 60601-1:2005+A1:2012+A2:2020, IEC 60601-2-18:2009, IEC 60601-1-2:2020, IEC 62133-2:2017, ISO 11135:2014, ISO 10993-5:2009, ISO 10993-10:2021, ISO 10993-23:2021, ISO 10993-11:2017, ISO 11607-1:2009, ISO 11737-2:2019, ASTM D4169, ASTM F1980, ASTM F88, ASTM D3078-02, ASTM F1929, ASTM F1886, DIN 58953-6:2023.

Substantial equivalence argument

The subject device is substantially equivalent to predicate K210270 because both are hysteroscope systems with disposable cannulae and reusable image processors intended for the same diagnostic and operative applications. Although the subject device offers design variations (multiple models, higher resolution options, variable tip angles, longer working length) and uses different image sensors and LED models, these differences do not raise new safety or effectiveness questions and are supported by comprehensive non-clinical testing demonstrating compliance with applicable standards.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →