K-numberK252268
Device nameV series portable oxygen concentrator (V5, V5C, V6, V6C)
ApplicantShenzhen Harveymed Technology Co., Ltd.
Product codeCAW
Device classClass II
Decision dateDec 16, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation868.5440
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The V series portable oxygen concentrator (models V5, V5C, V6, V6C) delivers high-concentration supplemental oxygen to patients requiring respiratory therapy on a prescription basis in home, institutional, or travel settings. The device uses pressure swing adsorption with molecular sieves to concentrate oxygen and can operate in pulse dose mode (6 levels) or continuous mode (1 level at 1.2 L/min for V5C and V6C models). It is not intended for life support and provides no patient monitoring.

Technological characteristics

The device uses breath detection technology and molecular sieve/pressure swing adsorption to concentrate oxygen, similar to predicate devices. It delivers oxygen at rated flow rates from 210 mL/min (Level 1) to 1200 mL/min (Level 6) in pulse mode and 1.2 L/min in continuous mode. Oxygen purity is ≥90% at all settings with inspiratory trigger sensitivity ≤0.12 cmH2O and maximum outlet pressure <199.3 kPa. The four models differ only in firmware/software configuration of available gear settings.

Test standards cited

IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 60601-1-6, IEC 60601-1-8, IEC 60601-1-11, ISO 80601-2-67, ISO 80601-2-69, IEC 62133-2, ISO 10993-1, ISO 10993-5, ISO 10993-10, ISO 10993-23, ISO 18562-1, ISO 18562-2, and ISO 18562-3 for electrical safety, EMC, biocompatibility, and breathing gas pathway evaluation.

Substantial equivalence argument

The subject device is substantially equivalent to the Inogen Rove 6 (K230052) and Kingon P2-TOC (K242718) predicates because it shares the same indications for use, operating principle (breath detection and molecular sieve pressure swing adsorption), and similar technological characteristics. All three devices are Class II portable oxygen generators with comparable safety and performance profiles, identical product code (CAW), and compliance with the same regulatory standards. Differences in alarm descriptions, power specifications, continuous mode availability, and pulse volumes are minor and mitigated by standard compliance testing, posing no different safety or effectiveness questions.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →