K-numberK252236
Device nameCP Relief Wand Rx - TENS/NMES
ApplicantN & C Holdings, LLC
Product codeGZJ
Device classClass II
Decision dateAug 15, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation882.5890
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The CP Relief Wand Rx - TENS/NMES is a portable, battery-powered device that combines transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and electrical muscular stimulation (EMS) for pain management and muscle therapy. As a TENS device, it provides symptomatic relief of chronic intractable pain and acute post-surgical/post-traumatic pain. As an EMS device, it relaxes muscle spasm, increases blood circulation, aids muscle re-education, prevents disuse atrophy, and maintains range of motion.

Technological characteristics

The device is portable with self-contained electrodes powered by a 9-volt alkaline battery. It features adjustable intensity (0-8 dial), selectable pulse width (150 or 230 microseconds), polarity switching, and continuous treatment capability. The waveform is biphasic rectangular with fixed 40 Hz frequency, maximum output voltage of 81.5V at 2K ohms, and maximum output current of 40.75 mA at 2K ohms. It uses Spectra 360 electrode gel and has no microprocessor control or rechargeable battery, unlike some predicate comparators.

Test standards cited

IEC60601-1 Edition 2:1988 (A1:1991 + A2:1995) for medical electrical equipment general safety and essential performance; IEC60601-1-2:2007 Third Edition for electromagnetic compatibility; and IEC60601-2-10 (1987) and Amendment 1 (2001) for nerve and muscle stimulator safety and essential performance.

Substantial equivalence argument

The device is technologically identical to the primary predicate (CP Relief Wand Model CP-1000, K133779) in all design features except the addition of EMS capability and gel electrode media. For the new EMS indication, the waveform attributes—particularly the biphasic rectangular waveform, pulse width range, frequency, maximum output voltage, current, and power density—are substantially equivalent to the second predicate (Unipro TENS/EMS combination device, K232441). Since the devices share near-identical principles of operation (surface application to intact skin), and the expanded EMS indication matches established predicate specifications for that modality, the differences do not raise new safety or effectiveness questions.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →