K-numberK251923
Device nameMedical Shaver System (Morcellator) (YSB-IIIA)
ApplicantHangzhou Hawk Optical Electronic Instruments Co., Ltd.
Product codeGCJ
Device classClass II
Decision dateJan 29, 2026
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation876.1500
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Medical Shaver System (Morcellator) YSB-IIIA is a reusable morcellation device designed for use under endoscopic visualization to cut and remove dissected benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) tissue during endoscopic urology procedures. It consists of a control unit, handpiece, footswitch, blades, waste bottle, collection bottle, and suction tube.

Technological characteristics

The device uses a cutting mechanism created by relative movement of an internal and external tube. Key differences from the predicate include: AC power supply (vs. battery-powered predicate), integrated suction pump (predicate requires external system), morcellation velocity of 10-20 grams/minute (predicate ~17 grams/minute), rotational speed of 300-1600 R/min (predicate 500-1475 RPM), and non-sterile reusable construction (predicate supplied sterile). Blade dimensions, suction flow rates, and regulatory compliance standards are comparable.

Test standards cited

Device tested to IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-2-18, IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 62304, ISO 10993-1/5/10/11/23 (biocompatibility), ISO 14971 (risk management), ISO 8600-1 (endoscopes), ISO 17664-1 and ISO 17665:2024 (sterilization and reprocessing), and ASTM D4169-22 (shipping containers). Compliance confirmed for safety, electromagnetic compatibility, usability, and software lifecycle processes.

Substantial equivalence argument

The YSB-IIIA is substantially equivalent to the predicate Cyber Blade (K192499) because both devices share identical intended use (morcellation of BPH tissue under endoscopy), the same operating principle (cutting via tube movement), and comparable performance characteristics including blade dimensions, rotational speeds, and suction flow rates. Minor differences in power supply, reusability, and morcellation rates are within acceptable ranges and do not raise new safety or effectiveness questions; the manufacturer demonstrated through bench testing that performance parameters are equivalent or superior to the predicate.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →