K-numberK251713
Device nameBD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System - GN Eravacycline (0.125-2 µg/mL)
ApplicantBecton, Dickinson and Company
Product codeLON
Device classClass II
Decision dateAug 8, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation866.1645
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System – GN Eravacycline is an in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) that quantitatively determines the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the antibiotic eravacycline against Gram-negative Enterobacterales bacteria. It uses a broth-based microdilution method with automated growth detection to report susceptibility results within 16 hours.

Technological characteristics

The device uses the same automated broth-based microdilution technology, redox-indicator detection, and growth-based methodology as the predicate (tigecycline panel). Both employ two-fold serial dilutions, automated reading, and similar inoculation methods (manual PhoenixSpec nephelometer or automated Phoenix AP). The main differences are the specific antimicrobial agent (eravacycline vs. tigecycline), the concentration range (0.125–2 µg/mL vs. 0.25–16 µg/mL), and interpretation categories (susceptible/non-susceptible vs. susceptible/intermediate/resistant).

Test standards cited

CLSI Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (M100, 35th edition), CLSI Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically (M07, 11th edition), and FDA Class II Special Controls Guidance Document for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Systems (August 2009).

Substantial equivalence argument

The device is substantially equivalent because it uses the identical Phoenix platform technology, methodology, and operational principles as the predicate K132909 (tigecycline). The only changes are the specific antimicrobial agent and its concentration range, which are routine additions to an established AST system. Performance data demonstrate >95% reproducibility and >90% essential agreement with CLSI reference methods across tested Enterobacterales species. Organism-specific limitations in the labeling address elevated very major error rates for certain species and MIC values, mitigating clinical risk despite some performance gaps.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →