K-numberK251696
Device nameUnimed Reusable SpO2 Sensors (-48 Series and -29 Series) (U410-48); Unimed Reusable SpO2 Sensors (-48 Series and -29 Series) (U410-29)
ApplicantUnimed Medical Supplies, Inc.
Product codeDQA
Device classClass II
Decision dateDec 1, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation870.2700
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Unimed Reusable SpO2 Sensors (models U410-48 and U410-29) are finger-clip pulse oximeter sensors for continuous, non-invasive monitoring of blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) and pulse rate in adult patients weighing over 30 kg in professional healthcare settings. The sensors use two-wavelength (660nm and 905nm) LED light absorption to measure oxygen saturation and are intended for prescription use only under no-motion conditions.

Technological characteristics

The subject devices operate via two-wavelength relative optical absorption, identical to the predicate. Key differences include connector pin configuration (6-pin for U410-29, 7-pin for U410-48), TPU cable jacket instead of PVC, and ISO10993-compliant patient-contacting materials instead of ABS/Silicone. Performance specifications for saturation accuracy (±3% at 70-100%), pulse rate accuracy (±3 bpm at 30-250 bpm), operating temperature (5-40°C), and humidity (10-85%) are identical to the predicate.

Test standards cited

Non-clinical testing conformed to IEC 60601-1 (medical electrical equipment safety), IEC 60601-1-2 (electromagnetic disturbances), ISO 80601-2-61 (pulse oximeter equipment), and ISO 10993 parts 5, 10, and 23 (biocompatibility testing for cytotoxicity, skin sensitization, and irritation). Clinical testing followed ISO 80601-2-61 and FDA guidance for pulse oximeter premarket notifications, including hypoxia studies in 12 adult volunteers with diverse skin pigmentation.

Substantial equivalence argument

The subject devices are substantially equivalent to predicate K142832 because they operate on identical principles, achieve identical performance specifications, are designed for the same finger application site, and have substantially equivalent sensor structure and materials. Although the intended patient population is narrower (adults >30 kg versus adults/pediatric/neonatal in predicate), biocompatibility and clinical accuracy testing confirm safety and effectiveness. Design differences in connectors and cable materials were validated through bench testing and clinical data.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →