K-numberK251654
Device nameBD Insyte™ Autoguard™ Shielded IV Catheter, BD Insyte™ Autoguard™ BC Shielded IV Catheter and BD Insyte™ Autoguard™ BC Pro Shielded IV Catheter
ApplicantBecton Dickinson Infusion Therapy Systems, Inc.
Product codeFOZ
Device classClass II
Decision dateJun 27, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation880.5200
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The BD Insyte™ Autoguard™ Shielded IV Catheter (in three variants: standard, BC, and BC Pro) is an over-the-needle peripheral intravascular catheter designed for short-term blood sampling, blood pressure monitoring, and fluid administration. It incorporates an active needlestick safety mechanism that retracts the needle into the barrel when a button is depressed, and the BC variants include a blood control technology that prevents blood flow until a Luer connection is made. The 22–18 GA devices are suitable for use with power injectors up to 300 psi.

Technological characteristics

The subject devices achieve their intended use through the same fundamental technology and principles of operation as the predicate: a peripheral intravascular catheter with BD Autoguard™ Push-button Shielding Technology, BD Instaflash™ needle visualization, and (for BC variants) a one-time use blood control septum. All device dimensions, materials (polyurethane catheter tubing, polycarbonate components, stainless steel needle and spring), sterilization method (ethylene oxide), and color-coding schemes are identical to the predicate. The only material change is qualification of a new green pigment subsupplier for the catheter adapter, maintaining the same CAS number and concentration.

Test standards cited

ISO 80369-7 (2021-05) for Luer connector testing; ISO 11607-1 (2019-02) for packaging of terminally sterilized medical devices; ASTM F2096-11 (Reapproved 2019) for detecting gross leaks in packaging; ASTM F88/F88M-15 for seal strength of flexible barrier materials; ISO 10993-1:2018 for biocompatibility evaluation; ISO 10993-5:2009 for in vitro cytotoxicity testing.

Substantial equivalence argument

The subject device is substantially equivalent because it addresses the same indications for use (peripheral vascular access for sampling, monitoring, and infusion) and achieves identical intended purposes using the same technological principles as the predicate K201075. Performance testing demonstrates that the subject device meets all predetermined acceptance criteria for frequency response, kink resistance, blood fill time, catheter separation force, and Luer compatibility. The catheter dimensions, materials, and sterilization method are unchanged; the only modification (a new green pigment supplier) maintains identical CAS number and concentration with no impact on device performance or safety. Risk analysis confirmed that proposed modifications do not alter the safety or effectiveness profile.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →