K-numberK251490
Device name8 mm Assist Cannula; 12 mm Assist Cannula
ApplicantIntuitive Surgical, Inc.
Product codeGCJ
Device classClass II
Decision dateJul 2, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation876.1500
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The 8 mm and 12 mm Assist Cannulas are hollow stainless steel tubes designed to establish a port of entry for surgical instruments, endoscopes, and accessories during laparoscopic procedures. They are used in medical facilities by trained professionals and may be used independently or in conjunction with da Vinci robotic surgical systems.

Technological characteristics

The subject devices are stainless steel cannulas with a seal attachment and obturator system to maintain an air-tight insufflated cavity. Key differences from the predicate include: the 8 mm cannula has a hexagonal chisel tip and ribbed tube (versus the predicate's round flat tip and smooth tube), while the 12 mm cannula has a round chisel tip and ribbed tube (versus round flat tip and smooth tube). The subject devices use 304 Full Hard stainless steel tubing rather than the predicate's 465 Carpenter Steel, and lack the predicate's magnetic fin in the funnel.

Test standards cited

ISO 10993-1 biocompatibility evaluation was performed on all materials. The document does not cite specific mechanical, dimensional, or functional test standards by code number.

Substantial equivalence argument

Substantial equivalence is established because both the subject devices and predicate share identical intended use (establishing surgical ports), indications for use, anatomical site of use, classification (Class II), regulatory pathway (21 CFR 876.1500), compatible accessories, and overall design intent. Although dimensional and design features differ (tip geometry, tube texture, material grade), performance testing—including bench testing, animal models, cadaver testing, and human factors evaluation with use-related risk analysis—demonstrates the subject devices perform as intended. The differences in design do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →