K-numberK251457
Device nameDiode laser therapy device (VADER)
ApplicantBeijing Superlaser Technology Co., Ltd.
Product codeGEX
Device classClass II
Decision dateSep 3, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation878.4810
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The VADER is a diode laser therapy device intended for hair removal and permanent hair reduction on all skin types (Fitzpatrick I-VI), including tanned skin. It uses an 808nm wavelength semiconductor diode laser that targets melanin in hair follicles, destroying germinal cells while sparing surrounding tissue. Permanent hair reduction is defined as long-term, stable reduction in hair regrowth measured at 6, 9, and 12 months after treatment completion.

Technological characteristics

The VADER operates at 808nm wavelength with a 12×12mm spot size, fluence range of 1–125 J/cm², frequency of 1–10 Hz, and pulse duration of 10–400ms. It has a smaller footprint (436×318×271mm, 24kg) compared to the predicate K210168 (450×430×1000mm, 52kg) and operates on AC 110V/60Hz power. The device includes a main unit, handpiece with removable treatment heads, and foot control activation.

Test standards cited

The device was tested against IEC 60601-1 (electrical safety), IEC 60601-1-2 (EMC), IEC 60601-2-22 (laser equipment safety), IEC 60825-1 (laser product safety), ISO 10993-5 (cytotoxicity), ISO 10993-10 (skin sensitization), and ISO 10993-23 (irritation). No clinical studies were included in the submission.

Substantial equivalence argument

The VADER is substantially equivalent because it uses the same diode laser technology at the same 808nm wavelength as predicate K210168, targets the same indication (hair removal with permanent hair reduction), operates within overlapping ranges for key parameters (fluence 1–125 J/cm² versus predicate 1–75 J/cm²), and meets identical electrical safety and EMC standards. Minor differences in spot size, dimensions, weight, and fluence range do not affect safety or effectiveness because spot size only changes treatment area, physical differences raise no mechanical performance issues under IEC 60601-1 compliance, and fluence remains within the safe and effective range demonstrated by predicate and reference devices. Biocompatibility testing confirms no cytotoxicity, sensitization, or irritation, matching the predicate device profile.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →