K-numberK251371
Device nameSysmex XR-Series (XR-20) Automated Hematology Analyzer
ApplicantSysmex America, Inc.
Product codeGKZ
Device classClass II
Decision dateJun 25, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation864.5220
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Sysmex XR-Series (XR-20) is a quantitative multi-parameter automated hematology analyzer for in vitro diagnostic screening of patient populations in clinical laboratories. It measures and classifies parameters in whole blood (WBC, RBC, hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelets, differentials, reticulocytes, and immature granulocytes) and body fluids (CSF, peritoneal, pleural, synovial) using RF/DC detection, sheath flow methods, and flow cytometry.

Technological characteristics

The XR-20 uses the same measurement principles (RF/DC detection, flow cytometry with semiconductor laser and SLS-hemoglobin method) and measures the same parameters as the predicate XN-20. Key differences are: the XR-20 has an additional white progenitor cell (WPC) measuring channel providing separate flags for blasts and abnormal lymphocytes; uses Lysercell WDF II instead of Lysercell WDF as lyse reagent; and achieves throughput of 110 samples/hour in whole blood mode versus 100 samples/hour for the predicate.

Test standards cited

Testing conducted per CLSI EP05-A3 (precision/repeatability), CLSI EP06-ED2:2020 (linearity), CLSI H26-A2 (carry-over), CLSI EP09-A3 (matrix and bridging studies), and referenced pediatric reference intervals from Wong et al. (2021). Standard hematology analytical performance testing protocols were applied.

Substantial equivalence argument

The XR-20 is substantially equivalent to the XN-20 predicate because both devices share identical indications for use, fundamental technology (RF/DC detection and flow cytometry), measurement principles, specimen types, reagents (same diluents, lyses, stains, calibrators, controls), analysis modes, and software specifications. Comprehensive analytical testing (precision, linearity, interference studies, stability, detection limits, carryover, and method comparison across 865 whole blood and 397 body fluid samples) demonstrated performance meeting predefined acceptance criteria with correlation coefficients ≥0.93 and acceptable bias limits. Clinical sensitivity/specificity studies showed flagging performance comparable to the predicate. The additional WPC channel, reagent variation, and higher throughput do not impact safety or effectiveness as demonstrated through full validation.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →