K-numberK251283
Device nameOnce-Fil Flow
ApplicantMediclus Co., Ltd.
Product codeEBF
Device classClass II
Decision dateJun 6, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation872.3690
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

Once-Fil Flow is a light-curing tooth-shade resin material designed for temporary dental restorations. It provides interim solutions before final prosthesis placement, serving functions such as pulp protection, maintaining tooth position, and temporary fillings in cavities and inlay/onlay cases. The device is available in two shades (Yellow for anterior teeth and Blue for visual contrast) and is applied by preparing the tooth surface, applying material, and light-curing it.

Technological characteristics

Once-Fil Flow shares the same light-curing mechanism, indications for use, biocompatibility, delivery system (syringe with disposable tip), period of use (prolonged exposure up to 30 days), and shelf-life (3 years) as the predicate device Clip Flow. Minor differences exist in raw material composition and some performance metrics (curing depth 4.3 mm vs. 4 mm; water absorption 32 µg/mm³ vs. unspecified; solubility 5 µg/mm³ vs. 18.4 µg/mm³), but both conform to ISO 4049 standards.

Test standards cited

ISO 4049 (appearance, weight, packaging, sensitivity to ambient light, curing depth, water sorption/solubility, color and color stability, Shore D hardness); ISO 868 (Shore D hardness); ISO 10993-1 (biological evaluation and risk management); ISO 10993-5:2009 (in vitro cytotoxicity); ISO 10993-21:2021 (irritation tests); ISO 10993-11:2017 (systemic toxicity); ISO 10993-10:2021 (skin sensitization).

Substantial equivalence argument

The subject device and predicate device have identical indications for use, intended users (licensed dentists), curing type (light-curing), and shelf-life. Although the subject device has slightly different raw material compositions, the performance test results (particularly curing depth, biocompatibility) and biocompatibility testing demonstrate safety and effectiveness equivalent to the predicate. The minor material differences do not raise safety or effectiveness concerns, supporting substantial equivalence.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →