K-numberK250862
Device nameEVIS EXERA III BRONCHOVIDEOSCOPE (OLYMPUS BF-XP190); EVIS EXERA III BRONCHOVIDEOSCOPE (OLYMPUS BF-P190); EVIS EXERA III BRONCHOVIDEOSCOPE (OLYMPUS BF-XT190); BRONCHOVIDEOSCOPE (OLYMPUS BF-H1100); BRONCHOVIDEOSCOPE (OLYMPUS BF-1TH1100)
ApplicantOlympus Medical Systems Corp.
Product codeEOQ
Device classClass II
Decision dateJun 23, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation874.4680
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

These are flexible bronchovideoscopes (five models: BF-XP190, BF-P190, BF-XT190, BF-H1100, BF-1TH1100) used for endoscopic diagnosis and treatment within the airways and tracheobronchial tree. They are intended to be used with an Olympus video system center, light source, documentation equipment, and endotherapy accessories such as biopsy forceps.

Technological characteristics

The subject devices have identical technological characteristics and design to their predicate devices with no modifications to design, materials, sterilization, shelf life, reprocessing, packaging, or software. The BF-XP190, BF-P190, and BF-XT190 models are cleared for use with the newly cleared EVIS X1 VIDEO SYSTEM CENTER CV-1500 and support imaging modes WLI, NBI, RDI, TXI, and BAI-MAC. All subject devices have updated labeling regarding proper use with laser, high frequency, and APC systems.

Test standards cited

Risk management was performed in accordance with ISO 14971:2019. The document does not cite other specific consensus standards such as IEC or ASTM.

Substantial equivalence argument

The devices raise no new issues of safety and effectiveness because they are unchanged in all design, material, sterilization, and operational characteristics from their predicates. Bench testing confirmed thermal safety, photobiological safety, color performance, resolution, image quality, and safety factors for laser, high-frequency, and APC use. Animal testing validated imaging modes with the new video processor. Since there are no design or material changes, extensive testing categories (biocompatibility, sterilization, electrical safety) were appropriately not repeated.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →