K-numberK250794
Device nameInVera Infusion Device
ApplicantInvera Medical
Product codeKRA
Device classClass II
Decision dateMar 12, 2026
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation870.1210
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The InVera Infusion Device is a minimally invasive, single-use catheter system designed to deliver physician-specified agents, including sclerosants, into peripheral veins (superficial and saphenous veins). It features a nitinol helical coil with a micro-textured surface that is deployed and recaptured under ultrasound guidance to induce localized venospasm and expose the subendothelial layer, then withdrawn to allow infusion of therapeutic agents.

Technological characteristics

The InVera uses a mechanical 6 mm nitinol helical coil with micro-textured lumen-engaging surface and a manual pin-and-pull handle mechanism for deployment/recapture, whereas the predicate ClariVein IC uses a motorized rotating stainless-steel wire at 3500 RPM with an angulated ball-tip. The InVera is 5 Fr diameter and 100 cm length versus the predicate at 3 Fr and 45–85 cm. Both are end-hole infusion catheters for peripheral vasculature delivery, with no motorized components in the InVera design.

Test standards cited

ISO 10555-1 (cardiovascular catheter specifications), ISO 10555-3 (testing), ISO 13485 (design controls and QMS), IEC 62366-1 (human factors/usability), AAMI TIR42 (particulate evaluation), FDA Guidance on Peripheral PTA and Specialty Catheters, FDA Guidance on Human Factors and Usability Engineering, and literature-based methods for simulated use, dimensional analysis, deployment/recapture, catheter bond strength, flexibility, and kink testing.

Substantial equivalence argument

The InVera Infusion Device has the same intended use, overall design intent, principle of operation (end-hole infusion into peripheral vasculature), and design features as the predicate ClariVein IC. Although there are technological differences—mechanical coil versus motorized wire—both deliver physician-specified agents for peripheral infusion via minimally invasive catheters. Performance testing including simulated use, dimensional analysis, deployment/recapture studies, and a comparative GLP animal study with clinical data demonstrate that the technological differences do not raise new questions regarding safety or efficacy, supporting substantial equivalence.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →