K-numberK250585
Device nameLumenaTM Ureteral Access Sheath
ApplicantCathegenix (Xiamen) Co., Ltd.
Product codeFED
Device classClass II
Decision dateJun 27, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation876.1500
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Lumena™ Ureteral Access Sheath is a single-use, sterile endoscopic device designed to establish a conduit during urological procedures, allowing endoscopes and surgical instruments to pass into the urinary tract. It is available in multiple sizes (9.5–13 French diameter, 35–45 cm length) with either a straight or bendable tip, and includes a sheath tube and dilator.

Technological characteristics

The proposed device shares the same indications, regulatory classification (Class II, 21 CFR 876.1500), and fundamental design as the predicate. Both are EtO-sterilized, single-use devices composed of PEBAX, stainless steel, and PTFE sheath tubes with polycarbonate or polyamide connectors, polyethylene dilator tubes, and a polyvinylpyrrolidone hydrophilic coating. The proposed device offers slightly narrower diameter options (9.5, 11, 12, 13 Fr vs. predicate's 10–16 Fr) and connector types limited to straight and Y-shaped (vs. predicate's straight, Y, W, and cross-shaped).

Test standards cited

ISO 11135:2014+A1:2018 (EtO sterilization validation), ASTM D4169-23 (shipping container performance), ASTM F1980-21 (accelerated aging of sterile barriers), ISO 11607-1:2019 and ISO 11607-2:2019 (packaging for sterilized devices), and ISO 10993-1 (biocompatibility evaluation including cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation, acute systemic toxicity, and pyrogen testing).

Substantial equivalence argument

The device is substantially equivalent because it shares identical indications for use, regulatory classification, and core technological design with the cleared predicate Disposable Ureteral Guide Sheath (K241181). Both establish a conduit for endoscopic urological procedures using biocompatible materials, identical sterilization methods, and comparable structural components. The proposed device's narrower size range and fewer connector options represent minor design variations that do not affect the fundamental function or safety profile, and comprehensive bench testing (tensile, coating, connector, compatibility, bending resistance, suction, and radiopacity) and biocompatibility studies confirm performance meets acceptance criteria equivalent to the predicate.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →