K-numberK250549
Device nameOptilite® Freelite Mx Kappa Free Kit; Optilite® Freelite Mx Lambda Free Kit
ApplicantThe Binding Site Group , Ltd.
Product codeDFH
Device classClass II
Decision dateMay 23, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation866.5550
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Optilite Freelite Mx Kappa and Lambda Free Kits are quantitative in vitro immunoturbidimetry assays that measure free light chains in serum and urine. They aid in diagnosing and monitoring multiple myeloma, lymphocytic neoplasms, Waldenström's macroglobulinemia, AL amyloidosis, light chain deposition disease, and connective tissue diseases like systemic lupus erythematosus; they also evaluate monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) in serum.

Technological characteristics

Both proposed and predicate devices use the same quantitative immunoturbidimetry assay type, detect the same analytes (Kappa and Lambda free light chains), employ identical detection antibodies (sheep anti-human antibodies bound to latex particles), and share the same reference intervals and calibrator traceability. The main difference is that the proposed device runs on the Optilite Analyzer while the predicate runs on the Siemens BN II system, and the proposed device has extended measuring ranges and different urine reference intervals.

Test standards cited

The submission references CLSI C56-A for sample centrifugation guidance and adapts the 25% free light chain change criterion from International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) guidelines for multiple myeloma monitoring.

Substantial equivalence argument

The assay methodology, analytes measured, and detection principles are identical to the predicate. No changes were made to the test principle or reagent composition. Clinical performance studies demonstrate the proposed device achieves a 56.3% positive rate in MGUS patients (100% in light chain MGUS) and 91.9% negative rate in non-MGUS disease controls, supporting the new MGUS evaluation claim. The device differences (analyzer platform and measuring ranges) do not raise safety or efficacy concerns because the underlying assay is unchanged and clinical data show it reliably detects MGUS when used according to labeling.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →