K-numberK250276
Device nameNitinol Enhanced Device (NED)
ApplicantEmbolization, Inc.
Product codeKRD
Device classClass II
Decision dateMay 15, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation870.3300
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Nitinol Enhanced Device (NED) is a vascular embolization system intended for arterial and venous occlusion in peripheral blood vessels (3–6 mm diameter). It consists of polymer-based implants with thrombogenic fibers, a nitinol pusher delivery system, and a transfer/removal tool, designed to obstruct blood flow through mechanical obstruction and thrombus formation.

Technological characteristics

The NED uses radiopaque polymer implants with UHMWPE external braid and thrombogenic tails, deployed via a 0.022-inch nitinol wire pusher through 0.027-inch microcatheters. The predicate Interlock-18 uses platinum with thrombogenic tails and a 0.021-inch microcatheter. Both employ interlocking-arm detachment mechanisms and are MR-conditional up to 3.0 Tesla. The NED targets smaller vessel diameters (3–6 mm) with three implant sizes, whereas the predicate covers a wider range (2–22 mm).

Test standards cited

ASTM F2129 and ASTM F3044 (nitinol corrosion); ISO 10993-1 (biocompatibility); delivery and deployment force testing; detachment mechanism testing; MRI compatibility; CT artifact evaluation; GLP acute and subchronic ovine studies; packaging integrity and shelf-life validation.

Substantial equivalence argument

The NED is substantially equivalent because it shares the same intended use (peripheral vascular embolization), classification (Class II, KRD), and basic operating principle (mechanical obstruction plus thrombogenic fiber-induced clotting) as the Interlock-18 predicate. Although materials differ (polymer vs. platinum) and the NED targets a narrower vessel range, it uses comparable thrombogenic fibers, identical interlocking detachment mechanisms, and equivalent MR safety. Non-clinical testing—including biocompatibility, deployment mechanics, and animal safety studies—supports performance parity, and no human clinical data was required because the indications are equivalent.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →