K-numberK250130
Device nameViction Disposable Irrigation and suction System (VC-FLA0514; VC-FLA0523; VC-FLA0532; VC-FLB0514; VC-FLB0523; VC-FLB0532; VC-FLC0514; VC-FLC0523; VC-FLC0532; VC-FLD0514; VC-FLD0523; VC-FLD0532)
ApplicantHangzhou Viction Medical Technology Co.,Ltd
Product codeGCJ
Device classClass II
Decision dateAug 6, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation876.1500
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Viction Disposable Irrigation and Suction System is a single-use, sterile surgical device designed to deliver irrigation fluids to surgical sites and remove fluid waste and tissue debris during general surgery and laparoscopic procedures. It consists of an irrigation and suction device with inner/outer stainless steel tubes, an on-off control button, conical connectors, a hand-piece, and double tubes (irrigation and suction) that connect via Yankee joint, insert needle, and Robert Clip. The device operates passively: irrigation fluid flows by gravity at ≥160 ml/min, and waste is suctioned at ≥600 ml/min via hospital negative pressure (maximum 60 kPa).

Technological characteristics

Both the proposed device and predicate use identical classification (Class II, GCJ, 21 CFR 876.1500), similar suction-irrigation probe specifications (5mm diameter × 14–32 cm length variants), comparable patient-contacting materials (stainless steel with PTEF coating, ABS, PVC, silicone), equivalent biocompatibility test panels (cytotoxicity, intracutaneous reactivity, acute systemic toxicity, pyrogen), and identical ethylene oxide sterilization per ISO 11135. Both are disposable with optional accessories.

Test standards cited

ISO 10993-1 (biocompatibility evaluation and testing); ASTM D3359-23 (coating adhesion per 3B standard); ISO 11135 (ethylene oxide sterilization validation); FDA Blue Book Memorandum #G95-1 (biological evaluation guidance). Bench testing included fluid flow rate, negative pressure resistance, irrigation tube sealing, particulate contamination, and packaging validation.

Substantial equivalence argument

The proposed device and predicate (K161421) share identical intended use (irrigation and suction in general and laparoscopic surgery), identical regulatory classification and product code, similar device dimensions and specifications (probe diameters and lengths), equivalent materials and biocompatibility profiles, and identical sterilization method. Non-clinical testing demonstrated the proposed device meets all predefined acceptance criteria and design specifications comparable to the predicate. Since the devices have the same intended use, similar design, materials, and performance characteristics with equivalent safety testing, the proposed device is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed predicate.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →