K-numberK244020
Device nameWrinkle Treatment Device (JM1, JM2B)
ApplicantShenzhen Qianyu Technology Co., Ltd.
Product codeOHS
Device classClass II
Decision dateMay 1, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation878.4810
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Wrinkle Treatment Device (models JM1 and JM2B) is an over-the-counter, wearable light-based mask for home use that treats full-face wrinkles. It emits red (660nm) and infrared (850nm) light from VCSEL (vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser) sources. Model JM1 uses direct button controls, while JM2B uses a connected controller for power and mode adjustments. Both are powered by rechargeable lithium-ion batteries.

Technological characteristics

JM1 features 136 light sources with 90/100 mWcm² fluence and 260cm² treatment area; JM2B features 140 sources with 40/70/100 mWcm² fluence and 330cm² treatment area. Key difference from the predicate: subject device uses VCSEL technology instead of LED. JM1 includes PC in materials (JM2B matches predicate materials exactly). Wavelengths, power supply, intended location, and overall form factor remain comparable to the predicate JM2.

Test standards cited

ISO 10993-5 (cytotoxicity), ISO 10993-10 (skin sensitization), ISO 10993-23 (irritation); IEC 60601-1:2020 (medical electrical equipment safety), IEC 60601-1-2:2020 (electromagnetic compatibility), IEC 60601-1-11:2020 (home healthcare environment), IEC 60825-1:2014 (laser safety). Software validation per Basic Documentation level and usability per FDA's Human Factors guidance (February 2016).

Substantial equivalence argument

The device shares identical intended use (OTC treatment of full-face wrinkles), same regulatory class (II), same mask design, and comparable wavelengths and fluence ranges with the predicate JM2. Although the subject uses VCSEL technology rather than LED, bench testing and thermal performance evaluation demonstrate comparable fluence magnitude, distribution, and spatio-temporal temperature profiles. Biocompatibility, electrical safety, EMC, and software validation testing all support that safety and efficacy profiles match the predicate despite the technological difference in light source type.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →