K-numberK244004
Device nameMicrocurrent Facial Device (CEC101, EE0101, EEI101)
ApplicantShenzhen Dachi Communication Co., Ltd.
Product codeNFO
Device classClass II
Decision dateJul 10, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation882.5890
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Microcurrent Facial Device (models CEC101, EE0101, EEI101) is a portable, handheld, battery-powered stimulator intended for over-the-counter aesthetic use. CEC101 and EE0101 are designed for facial stimulation, while EEI101 extends treatment to the face, neck, and body. The device delivers microcurrent electrical stimulation via electrodes and is controlled by firmware with multiple output modes and intensity levels.

Technological characteristics

The subject device uses a single output channel with voltage-controlled biphasic square-wave pulses, delivering 40–97.8 Hz frequencies at adjustable intensity levels (2–10 levels depending on model). Key electrical parameters fall within or near predicate ranges: maximum output voltages 3.54–34 V across different impedances; maximum currents 3.13–7.54 mA; pulse widths 145–174 μs. The device incorporates automatic shut-off, user override control, on/off and low-battery indicators, software/firmware control, and is powered by a 3.7V rechargeable lithium-ion battery. Materials include ABS and stainless steel; the device is non-sterile and reusable.

Test standards cited

Biocompatibility: ISO 10993-5 (cytotoxicity), ISO 10993-10 (skin sensitization), ISO 10993-23 (irritation). Electrical safety and EMC: IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 60601-1-11, IEC 60601-2-10, IEC 62133-2 (lithium battery safety). Software documentation per Basic Documentation requirements with verification and validation testing.

Substantial equivalence argument

The device is substantially equivalent because it shares the same regulatory classification (Class II, 21 CFR 882.5890), product code (NFO), intended use (over-the-counter aesthetic skin stimulation), and fundamental design (handheld, battery-powered microcurrent stimulator with software control). Although minor differences exist in output modes, intensity levels, dimensions, and specific electrical parameters, the submitter argues these are insignificant because: (1) the maximum and minimum electrical outputs remain within predicate ranges, (2) all electrical safety, EMC, and biocompatibility testing passed applicable IEC and ISO standards, and (3) the waveform parameters are similar to predicate device 1 and meet IEC 60601-2-10 requirements.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →