K-numberK243989
Device nameSecond Opinion® 3D
ApplicantPearl, Inc.
Product codeQIH
Device classClass II
Decision dateMay 23, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation892.2050
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

Second Opinion® 3D is a radiological automated image processing software device that uses machine learning to identify and mark clinically relevant anatomy in dental CBCT radiographs, including dentition, maxilla, mandible, inferior alveolar canal, maxillary sinus, nasal space, and airway. It is designed to aid dental health professionals as a concurrent and second reader for patients 12 years of age or older, and should not be used as a substitute for full patient evaluation or sole basis for diagnosis.

Technological characteristics

Both the subject device and predicate use neural network-based computer vision algorithms developed from open-source models using supervised machine learning techniques to perform 3D modeling of patient anatomy. Both devices process CBCT radiographs, display mask overlays on the radiograph, produce near-instantaneous identification results, and require only basic documentation levels. Both passed all verification and validation testing requirements.

Test standards cited

Not stated in this summary.

Substantial equivalence argument

Second Opinion® 3D is substantially equivalent to Relu Creator (K233925) because both devices have identical intended use (aiding dental clinicians in identifying clinically relevant anatomy on CBCT radiographs), employ the same fundamental technology (automatic segmentation using machine learning algorithms), pose the same primary hazard (inaccurate anatomical segmentations causing temporary non-serious injury), and demonstrate comparable bench performance accuracy. The subject device's Dice Similarity Coefficient scores (0.76–0.97 across anatomies) are statistically significant and comparable to the predicate's reported performance of 0.92±0.02 for dental implant segmentation.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →