K-numberK243953
Device nameAurora (ocufilcon D) Soft (Hydrophilic) Daily Wear Contact Lens (Tinted, Color)
ApplicantVizionfocus, Inc.
Product codeLPL
Device classClass II
Decision dateApr 10, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation886.5925
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

Aurora (ocufilcon D) is a soft daily-wear contact lens made from a hydrophilic copolymer that corrects refractive errors (myopia, hyperopia) and presbyopia. Available in spherical, toric, and multifocal designs, the lenses are tinted for visibility and can enhance or alter eye color using FDA-listed color additives. They contain UV-absorbing monomers and are suitable for frequent/planned replacement wear or single-use daily disposable wear.

Technological characteristics

The Aurora uses the same ocufilcon D material (45% polymer, 55% water) as the predicate ILICON device, with identical water content (55±2%), oxygen permeability (19.6×10⁻¹¹), refractive index (1.410), and modulus (0.49 MPa). Both are fully molded, FDA Group 4 soft hydrophilic lenses with UV blockers and pad-printed tinting. The primary difference is the tinting color: Aurora uses light yellow-green versus the predicate's blue color, and both maintain a 6.0 mm clear pupil diameter.

Test standards cited

Toxicology testing followed ISO 10993-5 (cytotoxicity), ISO 10993-11 (systemic toxicity), and ISO 10993-23 (ocular irritation). Physicochemical and mechanical properties were tested per ANSI Z80.20 (ophthalmics—contact lenses—standard terminology, tolerances, measurements, and physicochemical properties, 2010). All non-clinical studies were conducted under Good Laboratory Practice regulations per 21 CFR 860.7.

Substantial equivalence argument

Aurora is substantially equivalent to the predicate ILICON because both are made from identical ocufilcon D material, share all critical material properties (water content, oxygen permeability, refractive index, modulus), use the same manufacturing process (fully molded), and have identical intended uses (daily-wear correction of refractive errors in spherical, toric, and multifocal designs). The only difference—the color tint used in pad-printing—does not affect safety or effectiveness; preclinical toxicology, shelf-life, and physicochemical testing confirmed non-toxicity and material consistency. Since the lens specifications, performance characteristics, and design configurations are equivalent to a lawfully marketed predicate, the device presents no new safety or efficacy risks.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →