K-numberK243872
Device nameBD Veritor System for SARS-CoV-2
ApplicantBecton, Dickinson and Company
Product codeQVF
Device classClass II
Decision dateJun 16, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation866.3982
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The BD Veritor System for SARS-CoV-2 is a rapid (15-minute) chromatographic digital immunoassay that detects SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein antigens in anterior nasal swab specimens from symptomatic patients. It is intended as an aid in COVID-19 diagnosis, used either with repeat testing over three days or as a single negative test followed by molecular confirmation.

Technological characteristics

Both the subject device and predicate (Nano-Check COVID-19 Antigen Test) use lateral flow immunochromatography, the same specimen type (direct anterior nasal swab), target the same analyte (SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein), have identical test time (~15 minutes), and are prescription-use devices for symptomatic populations. The key difference is result interpretation: the subject device uses the BD Veritor Plus Analyzer (instrument-read with reflectance signal subtraction), whereas the predicate relies on visual interpretation by the user.

Test standards cited

CLSI EP05-A3:2019 (precision evaluation), CLSI EP25 (reagent stability), IEC 62304 (software lifecycle), ISO 14971 (risk management), IEC 62366-1 (usability engineering), ISO 15223-1 (symbols and labeling), and ISO 20417 (manufacturer-supplied information).

Substantial equivalence argument

The subject and predicate devices are substantially equivalent because they share the same intended use, specimen type, analyte, assay principle, and test duration across the same patient population. The difference in result interpretation method—automated instrument reading versus visual reading—does not raise new safety or effectiveness questions, as both methods detect the same immunochromatographic signal; the analyzer simply performs objective, quantitative reflectance measurement with background subtraction instead of relying on visual line detection. Clinical data demonstrated 84.0% positive and 99.7% negative percent agreement against RT-PCR across 1,032 samples, supporting analytical performance comparable to the predicate.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →