K-numberK243863
Device nameOpulus™ Lymphoma Precision
ApplicantRoche Molecular Systems, Inc.
Product codeQIH
Device classClass II
Decision dateMay 30, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation892.2050
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

Opulus™ Lymphoma Precision is an AI/ML software tool that assists physicians in quantifying disease burden in patients already diagnosed with FDG-avid lymphomas. It automatically segments and visualizes lymphoma lesions in whole-body FDG-PET/CT scans and calculates total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV). A radiologist must review and make the final interpretation of the annotated images.

Technological characteristics

Both the subject device and predicate (NS-HGlio) are AI/ML algorithms that segment disease-related tracer/contrast uptake, generate volumetric measurements, and overlay segmentation masks on input images. The subject device processes FDG-PET/CT scans for lymphoma, while the predicate processes multi-sequence MRI for high-grade gliomas. Both produce reports with image overlays and were validated against ground truth established by specialty-trained expert readers.

Test standards cited

IEC 62304:2006/AC:2015 (Medical device software – Software life cycle processes) and FDA Guidance 'Content of Premarket Submissions for Device Software Functions' (June 14, 2023). Performance was evaluated using absolute agreement metrics (cubic root transformation) and Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC).

Substantial equivalence argument

Both devices employ the same AI/ML methodology for automated segmentation and volumetric quantification of disease burden from radiological imaging, producing report and image overlay outputs validated against expert ground truth. Although they target different anatomical diseases (lymphoma vs. glioma) and imaging modalities (PET/CT vs. MRI), the core technological approach, validation methodology using reference standards from board-certified specialists, and output format establish substantial equivalence. The performance metrics demonstrate acceptable agreement with ground truth (mean DSC 0.70) comparable to predicate validation standards.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →