K-numberK243828
Device nameCIONIC NEURAL SLEEVE (NS-200)
ApplicantCionic, Inc.
Product codeGZI
Device classClass II
Decision dateMay 2, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation882.5810
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Cionic Neural Sleeve NS-200 is a wearable neuromuscular electrical stimulation device consisting of a fabric sleeve with embedded sensors, a battery-powered control unit, and a mobile app. It electrically stimulates leg muscles (shin, calf, quadriceps, hamstrings) to provide ankle and knee movement assistance in adults with foot drop or muscle weakness from upper motor neuron injury, and may also facilitate muscle re-education, prevent disuse atrophy, and provide biofeedback for relaxation and muscle retraining.

Technological characteristics

The NS-200 uses monophasic hybrid stimulation (not biphasic like the secondary predicate), delivers 100 mA at 500Ω and frequency range of 5–125 Hz, incorporates a 24-channel high-voltage multiplexer to control 8 virtual positive and 15 virtual negative output channels from a single stimulator channel, includes 8 EMG input channels with 2 kHz sampling at 0.0298 μV sensitivity using bipolar detection, and adds new biofeedback modes (Visual Biofeedback Mode and Muscle Activated Stimulation Mode) via software enhancements that leverage existing sEMG functionality without changing hardware.

Test standards cited

IEC 60601-1 (general medical device safety), IEC 60601-1-2 (electromagnetic compatibility), IEC 60601-2-10 (muscle and nerve stimulators), IEC 62304 (software lifecycle processes), IEC 62366 (usability), IEC 60601-1-6 (summative usability evaluation), and 21 CFR 898 (electrical safety compliance).

Substantial equivalence argument

The NS-200 is identical to the primary predicate (NS-100, K221823) in stimulation output modes, channel architecture, battery specifications, and overall intended use for foot drop and muscle weakness. Minor hardware changes (simplified sleeve electronics, enhanced grips, improved Velcro) and the addition of biofeedback software do not alter the fundamental therapeutic mechanism or safety profile. Both devices use the same monophasic hybrid stimulation, equivalent maximum phase charge (40 μC), and pass identical IEC safety standards, demonstrating that the new biofeedback functionality leverages existing sEMG capabilities without introducing new risks or requiring additional clinical evidence.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →