K-numberK243679
Device nameMammoScreen® (4)
ApplicantTherapixel
Product codeQDQ
Device classClass II
Decision dateJul 3, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation892.2090
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

MammoScreen 4 is an AI-powered software device that assists radiologists in interpreting mammograms by detecting and characterizing breast lesions suspicious for cancer. It processes full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis images, marks detected findings with suspicion scores (1-10), classifies lesions as masses/asymmetries, distortions, or calcifications, and provides location information. The device is intended as a concurrent reading aid to support physician decision-making, not replace clinical judgment.

Technological characteristics

MammoScreen 4 uses the same machine learning-based AI architecture as its predicate (MammoScreen 3) and maintains identical outputs: graphical marks, suspicion scores at finding/breast/case levels, lesion type classification, and spatial localization. The main differences are support for Hologic Envision systems (new in version 4) and inclusion of a Predetermined Change Control Plan for future algorithm modifications. Both versions process 2D and 3D mammography with optional prior examinations.

Test standards cited

Testing complied with IEC 62304:2006/A1:2016 (Medical device software - Software life-cycle processes) and IEC 62366-1:2015+AMD1:2020 (Medical devices - Application of usability engineering to medical devices). Standalone performance validation included 1,475 patients and 2,950 studies with non-inferiority testing. Clinical validation comprised three multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) studies for FFDM, DBT, and combined modalities.

Substantial equivalence argument

MammoScreen 4 is substantially equivalent to MammoScreen 3 because both devices have identical intended use (concurrent reading aid for mammogram interpretation), same fundamental AI/machine learning technology, identical output formats (suspicion scores, lesion characterization, localization), and serve the same user and patient populations. The design changes (extended system support) do not raise different safety or effectiveness questions. Non-inferiority standalone testing demonstrated superior performance compared to the predicate, and MRMC studies showed radiologists using MammoScreen 4 perform better than unaided radiologists, establishing safety and effectiveness.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →