K-numberK243611
Device nameJLK-SDH
ApplicantJLK, Inc.
Product codeQAS
Device classClass II
Decision dateMar 3, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation892.2080
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

JLK-SDH is an AI-powered radiological software that analyzes non-contrast CT images of the head to detect suspected subdural hemorrhage (SDH) and sends notifications to radiologists. It operates as a parallel workflow tool alongside standard clinical care, enabling radiologists to identify and communicate patient images to specialists without modifying the standard diagnostic workflow.

Technological characteristics

JLK-SDH uses an artificial intelligence/machine learning algorithm hosted on JLK servers that receives DICOM-formatted CT images, performs analysis, and sends push notifications via a mobile application. Like the predicate device, it provides notification-only functionality with no image alteration or marking. The key difference is that JLK-SDH notifies radiologists who then contact appropriate specialists, whereas the predicate (Viz SDH) directly notifies neurovascular/neurosurgical specialists, but both achieve equivalent clinical utility within U.S. standard-of-care workflows.

Test standards cited

Not stated in this summary. The document references FDA's Guidance for Industry on 'Content of Premarket Submissions for Device Software Functions' (June 14, 2023) and compliance with the DICOM standard, but does not cite specific ISO, IEC, or ASTM consensus standards.

Substantial equivalence argument

JLK-SDH is substantially equivalent because it shares the same intended use (notification-only triage for SDH detection), identical indications, and comparable technological characteristics (AI/ML algorithm, DICOM compatibility, parallel workflow, non-diagnostic preview images, mobile notification interface) with the predicate Viz SDH. Performance validation on 560 independent NCCT scans demonstrated sensitivity of 97.1% and specificity of 97.4%, meeting or exceeding the predicate's established performance. The notification recipient difference (radiologist vs. specialist) does not raise new safety or effectiveness questions because U.S. hospital workflows include duty radiologists who perform the same triage and specialist consultation function, providing equivalent clinical benefit.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →