K-numberK243566
Device nameCardioTag™
ApplicantCardiosense, Inc.
Product codeDXR
Device classClass II
Decision dateJul 22, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation870.2320
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The CardioTag is a wearable device that records and displays cardiac vibrations (seismocardiogram), single-channel ECG, and pulse waveforms via photoplethysmography. It measures heart rate, pulse rate, and aortic valve timing. Intended for spot-check measurements of adult patients in clinics or home settings under physician care, with data provided to healthcare professionals as a diagnostic aid.

Technological characteristics

The CardioTag combines outputs from two predicate devices into one all-in-one wearable solution. Both the subject and primary predicate are reusable, battery-powered, chest-worn devices performing spot-check (non-continuous) measurements with ECG and vibration waveform outputs in reports. The subject and secondary predicate are both battery-powered, reusable spot-check devices outputting PPG waveforms and using PPG for heart rate calculation. Minor technological differences were addressed through risk management, bench-testing, clinical testing, and FDA-recognized standards application.

Test standards cited

ISO 10993-1 (Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part 1: Evaluation and Testing Within a Risk Management Process); FDA guidance on software content in premarket submissions (November 2021); standards for electrical safety, defibrillation-proof applied parts, and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) and RF disturbance immunity.

Substantial equivalence argument

The CardioTag has identical intended use as the predicates and similar technological characteristics as a reusable, battery-powered, chest-worn spot-check device. Bench-testing confirmed ECG, PPG, and SCG functions met specifications; biocompatibility testing (cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation) passed for limited skin contact; electrical safety and EMC testing complied with applicable standards; and clinical study demonstrated acceptable performance compared to commercially available devices with high accuracy. These comprehensive test results demonstrate that technological differences do not raise new safety or effectiveness questions.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →