K-numberK243561
Device nameNano-Check Influenza+COVID-19 Dual Test
ApplicantNano-Ditech Corporation
Product codeSCA
Device classClass II
Decision dateJun 17, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation866.3987
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Nano-Check Influenza+COVID-19 Dual Test is a rapid lateral flow immunoassay for qualitative detection and differentiation of influenza A and B nucleoprotein antigens and SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antigen directly from anterior nasal swab specimens. It is intended for use in patients presenting with symptoms of respiratory infection and is for prescription use only in CLIA-waived clinical settings.

Technological characteristics

The device is substantially identical to the predicate (Healgen Rapid Check COVID-19/Flu A&B Antigen Test) in all material respects: both use lateral flow immunochromatography technology, detect the same three analytes in anterior nasal swabs, provide qualitative results, require 15-minute reading time, and use visual interpretation. The only meaningful difference is that the candidate is prescription-use only and for CLIA-waived settings, whereas the predicate is over-the-counter self-testing.

Test standards cited

Not stated in this summary. The document does not cite specific consensus standards (ISO, IEC, ASTM, etc.) for device development or validation.

Substantial equivalence argument

Substantial equivalence is supported by: (1) identical intended use (detection of Flu A/B and SARS-CoV-2 antigens in nasal swabs from symptomatic patients), (2) identical technological platform (lateral flow immunochromatography with colloidal gold-conjugated antibodies and streptavidin capture), (3) comprehensive analytical validation showing 100% precision at higher concentrations, no cross-reactivity with 50 pathogens, no endogenous/exogenous interference, and consistent lot-to-lot performance, and (4) clinical data from 1,969 subjects demonstrating sensitivity and specificity (SARS-CoV-2: 87.6%/99.8%, Flu A: 86.9%/99.6%, Flu B: 86.8%/99.7%) that are consistent with predicate device performance and do not raise new safety or effectiveness questions.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →