K-numberK243502
Device nameEVIS EUS ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND CENTER OLYMPUS EU-ME3 (OLYMPUS EU-ME3)
ApplicantOlympus Medical Systems Corporation
Product codeIYN
Device classClass II
Decision dateJan 17, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation892.1550
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The EVIS EUS ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND CENTER OLYMPUS EU-ME3 is an endoscopic ultrasound imaging system that generates ultrasound waves via transducers to acquire and display real-time ultrasound images of target tissues and organs. It is intended for use with Olympus ultrasound endoscopes and probes to visualize the gastrointestinal tract, biliary and pancreatic ducts, airways, and other anatomical regions, and can provide measurements of distance, area, velocity, and tissue strain.

Technological characteristics

Both the subject and predicate devices share identical design, materials, principle of operation, and energy source with acoustic output below 720 mW/cm². Both provide B mode, Pulsed Wave Doppler, Color Doppler, Power Doppler, and Tissue Harmonic Echo modes. The subject device adds Strain Ratio/Strain Histogram and Shear Wave Quantification capabilities (supported by a reference device), and Contrast Harmonic Echo mode, whereas the predicate included 3-D imaging which the subject does not.

Test standards cited

IEC 60601-1, ANSI AAMI IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 60601-1-6, IEC 60601-2-18, IEC 60601-2-37, IEC 60601-4-2 (electrical safety and EMC); ANSI AAMI ISO 14971 (risk management); ANSI AAMI IEC 62304 (software lifecycle); ANSI AAMI IEC 62366-1 (human factors); ISO 17664-1 (cleaning/disinfection validation). Compliance also verified against FDA Guidance for Marketing Clearance of Diagnostic Ultrasound Systems and Transducers (February 21, 2023).

Substantial equivalence argument

The subject device and predicate share the same technological characteristics—design, materials, operating principles, and energy source—with identical acoustic output limits and core imaging modes (B, PWD, Color Doppler, Power Doppler, Harmonic Imaging). Although the subject adds Shear Wave Quantification and Contrast Harmonic Echo (supported by nonclinical testing comparing to a reference device) and omits 3-D imaging, these differences do not introduce new safety or effectiveness issues. The indications for use are similar; additional clinical applications listed for the subject (intraluminal ultrasound for airways, trans-rectal, trans-urethral applications) were already identified as clinical applications for the predicate. Comprehensive nonclinical testing demonstrated the subject device performs as safely and effectively as the predicate.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →