K-numberK243262
Device nameQuickFinder COVID-19/Flu Antigen Self Test / QuickFinder COVID-19/Flu Antigen Pro Test
ApplicantOsang, LLC
Product codeSCA
Device classClass II
Decision dateJan 13, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation866.3987
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The QuickFinder COVID-19/Flu Antigen Self Test and QuickFinder COVID-19/Flu Antigen Pro Test are lateral flow immunochromatographic assays for qualitative detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, and influenza B antigens from anterior nasal swab samples. The Self Test variant is for non-prescription home use by individuals aged 14 and older testing themselves or adults testing individuals aged 2 and older; the Pro Test is for use by individuals aged 14 and older or adults testing individuals aged 2 and older. Results are visually interpreted within 15 minutes.

Technological characteristics

Both the proposed device and the predicate (Healgen Rapid Check COVID-19/Flu A & B Antigen Test) are lateral flow immunoassays using the same assay principle, requiring no instrumentation or mobile applications. Both detect SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein and influenza A and B nucleoprotein from anterior nasal swab specimens, produce visual results in 15 minutes, and use internal controls. The primary difference is the proposed device specifies detection within 4 days post-symptom onset versus the predicate's 5 days, and allows both lay and professional use versus lay use only.

Test standards cited

Not stated in this summary.

Substantial equivalence argument

The proposed device demonstrates substantial equivalence through identical intended use (OTC detection of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A and B from anterior nasal swabs) and identical fundamental technology (lateral flow immunoassay, visually read). Comprehensive analytical testing—including limit of detection studies, inclusivity across multiple viral strains, co-spiking equivalency, cross-reactivity/microbial interference, competitive interference, and stability studies—showed performance equivalent to or better than the predicate. Clinical evaluation on 788 symptomatic subjects demonstrated clinically acceptable sensitivity and specificity (SARS-CoV-2: 90.6% PPA/99.4% NPA; Flu A: 89.7% PPA/98.8% NPA; Flu B: 86.0% PPA/99.7% NPA) comparable to molecular reference assays. Usability studies confirmed lay users could perform the test correctly and interpret results accurately, with no new safety or effectiveness concerns identified.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →