K-numberK243261
Device nameFUJIFILM Endoscope Model EC-860P/M; FUJIFILM Endoscope Model EC-860P/L; FUJIFILM Endoscope Model EC-860S/L
ApplicantFujifilm Corporation
Product codeFDF
Device classClass II
Decision dateMay 23, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation876.1500
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

These three FUJIFILM endoscope models (EC-860P/M, EC-860P/L, EC-860S/L) are flexible colonoscopes intended for visualization, observation, diagnosis, and endoscopic treatment of the rectum and large intestine. They use a CMOS image sensor and fiber optic light guides to transmit images to a monitor for clinical evaluation.

Technological characteristics

The devices feature a bending portion controlled by knobs to angulate the distal end, a flexible insertion portion containing light guides, air/water channels, and a forceps channel. Compared to the predicate EC-760R-V/L, the proposed models have differences in objective lens F# and resolution, distal end diameter, total length, flexible portion diameter, and material composition, though these differences remain within specifications consistent with reference devices.

Test standards cited

Electrical safety tested to ANSI/AAMI ES 60601-1:2012, IEC 60601-1-2:2020, IEC 60601-1-6:2020, and IEC 60601-2-18:2009. Biocompatibility per ISO 10993-1:2018, ISO 10993-5:2009, and ISO 10993-10:2021. Endoscope-specific testing per ISO 8600-1:2015, ISO 8600-3:2019, and ISO 8600-4:2014. Software testing per IEC 62304:2015. Reprocessing validation followed FDA 2015 guidance.

Substantial equivalence argument

The proposed devices have identical indications for use and same principles of operation as the predicate EC-760R-V/L. Although optical characteristics and dimensional parameters differ, bench testing demonstrated substantially equivalent performance. Material differences were validated through biocompatibility testing showing no new safety or efficacy concerns. All measured parameters (field of view, resolution, bending capability, suction rate, illumination, etc.) met specifications, establishing substantial equivalence despite minor design variations.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →