K-numberK243241
Device namePhasix ST Umbilical Hernia Patch
ApplicantDavol, Inc., A Subsidiary of C.R. Bard, Inc.
Product codeOWT
Device classClass II
Decision dateFeb 19, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation878.3300
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Phasix™ ST Umbilical Hernia Patch is a sterile, single-use surgical mesh device for reinforcing soft tissue weakness during umbilical hernia repair. It is a self-expanding, fully resorbable mesh made of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) with a resorbable hydrogel coating, a positioning pocket, and a strap containing a polydioxanone (PDO) ring for memory and stability.

Technological characteristics

The mesh comprises two layers of P4HB co-knitted with polyglycolic acid (PGA) fibers and coated with a resorbable hydrogel (sodium hyaluronate, carboxymethylcellulose, and polyethylene glycol). Key differences from predicates include: hybrid positioning straps combining P4HB and polypropylene (versus polypropylene-only in Ventralex ST), a blue-dyed delineation marker on the straps, and the absence of a pre-attached removable positioning system (unlike Phasix ST Mesh with Open Positioning System).

Test standards cited

ISO 10993-1 (Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process, September 8, 2023) guided biocompatibility testing. Testing included material chemical characterization, cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation, acute systemic toxicity, pyrogenicity, subacute and subchronic toxicity, genotoxicity, and implantation studies.

Substantial equivalence argument

The device is substantially equivalent because it has identical intended use, materials (mesh component identical to secondary predicate Phasix ST Mesh with Open Positioning System), packaging, and sterilization method as the predicates. Although hybrid positioning straps differ from Ventralex ST's polypropylene-only design, bench testing of these differences (ball burst strength, suture retention, tear strength, strap attachment strength, etc.) demonstrated performance and safety comparable to predicates. Biocompatibility testing addressed the new material combination (P4HB and PDO) and confirmed no adverse interactions. Animal study data from the predicate devices supports in-vivo safety for the identical mesh materials.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →