K-numberK243229
Device nameBunkerhill AVC
ApplicantBunkerHill Health
Product codeJAK
Device classClass II
Decision dateJan 27, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation892.1750
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

Bunkerhill AVC is a software device that automatically detects and quantifies aortic valve calcification in non-gated, non-contrast chest CT images for patients aged 40 and above. It outputs an estimated Agatston-equivalent calcium score and a circular region of interest showing the location of detected calcium, intended as adjunctive information to assist physicians during case review without replacing the original CT scan or clinical judgment.

Technological characteristics

Both the subject device and predicate (iCAC) use deep-learning algorithms to analyze DICOM-formatted non-gated chest CT images and generate Agatston-equivalent scores. Key differences: Bunkerhill AVC detects aortic valve calcium and provides a binary presence/absence output with a circular ROI, whereas iCAC detects coronary artery calcium and provides segmentation with four risk categories. Both support slice thickness up to 5 mm and optional reporting to patient records.

Test standards cited

Not stated in this summary. The document references FDA guidance on software submissions ('Content of Premarket Submissions for Device Software Functions') but does not cite specific ISO, IEC, or ASTM consensus standards.

Substantial equivalence argument

Both devices use identical technological approaches (deep learning, DICOM input, Agatston-equivalent scoring, adjunctive physician workflow integration) on the same imaging modality and anatomy (chest CT). The anatomical difference—aortic valve versus coronary arteries—does not raise new safety or effectiveness concerns because both perform the same functional task: detecting and localizing calcification to assist clinical review. Performance testing demonstrated Bunkerhill AVC achieved acceptance criteria for mean difference and limits of agreement (bias −5.15 AU, LoA −200.96 to 190.65 AU) comparable to predicate device performance, satisfying the primary endpoint for substantial equivalence under 21 CFR 807.92(b)(3).

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →