K-numberK243168
Device nameAlinity i Rubella IgG
ApplicantAbbott Laboratories
Product codeLFX
Device classClass II
Decision dateJun 20, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation866.3510
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Alinity i Rubella IgG is a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) that quantitatively measures IgG antibodies to rubella virus in human serum and plasma samples on the Alinity i automated system. It is used to determine immune status to rubella in individuals, including women of child-bearing age, and has not been cleared for blood donor screening or use in cord blood, neonatal, immunocompromised, or immunosuppressed populations.

Technological characteristics

The subject device uses CMIA methodology with acridinium-labeled conjugate and paramagnetic microparticles, whereas the predicate (bioMérieux VIDAS RUB IgG) uses enzyme-linked fluorescent assay (ELFA) technology. The Alinity i assay includes 6 calibrators and 3 controls compared to the predicate's 1 calibrator and 2 controls, accepts both serum and plasma matrices (predicate serum only), and has a 30-day calibration storage window versus the predicate's 14 days.

Test standards cited

Testing followed CLSI EP05-A3 (precision), CLSI EP17-A2 (detection limits), CLSI EP06 (linearity), CLSI EP07 and EP37 (interference testing), and CLSI EP12-A2 (clinical method comparison). Calibrators and controls are referenced to the WHO International Standard RUBI-1-94 for Anti-Rubella Immunoglobulin.

Substantial equivalence argument

Although methodology differs (CMIA vs. ELFA), both assays share identical intended use, measure the same analyte using rubella virus antigen and anti-human IgG antibodies, produce equivalent result interpretations (nonreactive <5, equivocal 5–<10, reactive ≥10 IU/mL), and demonstrate substantial clinical concordance. CDC panel testing showed 93.9% positive percent agreement and 100% negative percent agreement; clinical agreement across multiple specimen categories (routine orders, pregnant females) ranged from 93–97.7% positive agreement and 77.8–100% negative agreement, establishing that the assay performs equivalently to FDA-cleared comparator methods despite different technological platforms.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →