K-numberK243086
Device nameUnimed Reusable Finger Clip SpO2 Sensors (UXXX-91 Series) (U403-91); Unimed Reusable Finger Clip SpO2 Sensors (UXXX-91 Series) (U410-91)
ApplicantUnimed Medical Supplies, Inc.
Product codeDQA
Device classClass II
Decision dateFeb 20, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation870.2700
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Unimed Reusable Finger Clip SpO2 Sensors (models U403-91 and U410-91) are non-invasive pulse oximetry sensors that continuously monitor functional oxygen saturation (SpO2) and pulse rate in adult patients weighing over 30 kg. These prescription-use sensors attach to a patient's finger and work with Philips Intellivue MP30 monitors.

Technological characteristics

Both subject and predicate devices use two-wavelength relative optical absorption with identical sensor architecture (Philips D8 connector, cable, LED/photodetector, finger clip). The subject device uses LEDs at 663/890 nm versus predicate at ~660/~890 nm. Both achieve ±3% saturation accuracy (70–100%) and ±3 bpm pulse rate accuracy (30–250 bpm). Subject device biocompatible materials (ABS, silicone, TPU) meet ISO 10993 standards.

Test standards cited

IEC 60601-1 and IEC 60601-1-2 (electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility); ISO 80601-2-61 (pulse oximeter performance); ISO 10993-5, 10993-10, and 10993-23 (biocompatibility: cytotoxicity, skin irritation, and sensitization). Clinical validation per ISO 80601-2-61 and FDA pulse oximeter guidance using hypoxia testing in 12 subjects including three with dark skin pigmentation (Fitzpatrick Type 5–6), collecting over 200 data points.

Substantial equivalence argument

The devices are substantially equivalent because they share identical intended use (SpO2 and pulse rate monitoring in adult patients), identical principle of operation (two-wavelength optical absorption), identical structural composition, and overlapping performance specifications. The minor wavelength variance (663 nm vs. ~660 nm) and slightly tighter pulse rate accuracy specification on the subject device do not affect safety or effectiveness. Clinical data demonstrate comparable accuracy across a representative population including diverse skin pigmentation, meeting the same ISO standards as the predicate.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →