K-numberK243079
Device nameNeuroTrac® MyoPlus Pro (MYO120U)
ApplicantVerity Medical , Ltd.
Product codeKPI
Device classClass II
Decision dateJun 26, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation876.5320
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The NeuroTrac® MyoPlus Pro (MYO120U) is a single-channel pelvic floor muscle stimulator for treating stress, urge, and mixed urinary incontinence in adult women aged 22+. It operates in three modes: STIM (electrical stimulation and neuromuscular re-education), EMG (relaxation and muscle re-education), and ETS (EMG-triggered stimulation). The device delivers symmetrical, biphasic, rectangular waveforms via a vaginal probe and can be operated by a physician or patient under physician instruction.

Technological characteristics

The subject device generates constant-current, biphasic stimulation at 2–100 Hz with maximum output of 45V @ 500Ω, 103V @ 2kΩ, and 170V @ 10kΩ. It uses a single output channel for stimulation and two for EMG, powered by 4×AAA alkaline batteries (6V), with program durations of 15–99 minutes. The primary predicate (K083704) shares identical voltage, frequency, and waveform characteristics. The secondary predicate (K201290) has lower maximum voltages (40V/70V) and different power density but comparable functional architecture.

Test standards cited

IEC 60601-1:2020 (medical electrical equipment basic safety and essential performance), IEC 60601-1-2:2020 (electromagnetic compatibility), FDA guidance on software verification and validation for medical devices, and FDA cybersecurity guidance (September 27, 2023).

Substantial equivalence argument

The subject device has identical intended use and same core safety/performance parameters (voltage, frequency, waveform shape, current regulation, net charge) as the primary predicate (K083704) for STIM mode, and substantially overlapping characteristics with the secondary predicate (K201290) for EMG/ETS modes. Although minor technological differences exist in power density and battery source, performance testing confirmed these differences do not raise new safety or effectiveness questions. All electrical safety, EMG, and software validation testing met acceptance criteria, establishing that functional and operational equivalence has been demonstrated.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →