K-numberK243039
Device nameUreteral Stents (AF-D series)
ApplicantAlton (Shanghai) Medical Instruments Co., Ltd.
Product codeFAD
Device classClass II
Decision dateJun 18, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation876.4620
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Ureteral Stents (AF-D series) are flexible, double-pigtail stents made of thermoplastic polyurethane with hydrophilic coating, used for temporary internal drainage from the ureteropelvic junction to the bladder in patients with benign, malignant, or post-traumatic obstruction. The stents are placed via endoscopic, percutaneous, or open surgical techniques and must be removed within 30 days.

Technological characteristics

The subject device differs from the predicate (Cook Universa Soft Stents) in several ways: it offers 4Fr diameter (predicate offers 5-8Fr), different stent lengths (8-28cm vs 8-30cm), lacks the predicate's radiopaque-tipped introducer and suture tether features, and uses different guidewire diameters (0.025" for 4/5Fr; 0.035" for 6/7Fr versus predicate's 0.035-0.038"). Both are double-pigtail designs sterilized by EtO for single use.

Test standards cited

ISO 10993-1 for biocompatibility testing; ISO 11135:2014 for ethylene oxide sterilization achieving SAL 10⁻⁶; FDA guidance on 'Guidance for the Content of Premarket Notification for Ureteral Stents' (1993) for bench performance testing protocols.

Substantial equivalence argument

Although the devices have different technological characteristics (diameter range, introducer design, guidewire specifications), comprehensive bench performance testing demonstrated that the subject device meets or exceeds predicate performance on curl retention, break strength, flow rate, friction force, kink stability, insertion/removal simulation, and chemical properties. Biocompatibility testing showed no safety concerns. The identical indications for use, similar double-pigtail design, common sterilization method, and equivalent safety and performance profile despite design differences establish substantial equivalence.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →