K-numberK242948
Device nameAdora DRFi (04550010)
ApplicantNrt X-Ray A/S
Product codeJAA
Device classClass II
Decision dateDec 23, 2024
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation892.1650
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Adora DRFi is a ceiling-suspended diagnostic X-ray system with a flat panel detector for radiography and radioscopy of the whole body in adult and pediatric patients. It allows patients in various positions (supine, standing, sitting, wheelchair, stretcher) and performs radiographic and radioscopic examinations, but is not intended for mammography.

Technological characteristics

The Adora DRFi uses a Canon CXDI-RF Wireless B1 flat panel detector (43×42 cm, 160-micron pixels) with a CPI Indico IQ 80 kW generator capable of 40–125 kV fluoroscopy and 40–150 kV radiography. The predicate Siemens Multitom Rax uses a proprietary detector (43×42 cm, 148-micron pixels) with a Siemens Polydoros F80 generator. Both systems support radiography, fluoroscopy, cine, and 3D acquisition; the Adora offers up to 999 auto-positions while Siemens offers over 1000 predefined positions. The Adora table features optional 340° rotation and longitudinal/transverse movement; the Siemens table is fixed.

Test standards cited

IEC 60601-1 (Edition 3.2, 2020), IEC 60601-1-2 (Edition 4.1, 2020), IEC 60601-1-3 (Edition 2.2, 2021), IEC 60601-1-6 (Edition 3.2, 2020), IEC 60601-2-54 (Edition 2.0, 2022), IEC 62304 (2015), IEC 62366-1 (2020), 21 CFR Part 1020, ISO 13485, ISO 14971, and FDA guidance on device software and cybersecurity.

Substantial equivalence argument

Both systems are stationary universal diagnostic X-ray platforms using ceiling-suspended tubes and flat panel detectors synchronized for rotation around a patient center, with substantially identical intended uses and target populations. Though component designs differ (e.g., detector pixel size, generator specifications, table mobility), the clinical capabilities are comparable and both support the same examination procedures. The differences reflect design philosophy rather than functional divergence; the Adora prioritizes ergonomics and workflow while the predicate is more traditional. Minor specification variations do not raise new safety or effectiveness issues.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →