K-numberK242819
Device nameIPD Dental Implant Abutments
ApplicantImplant Protesis Dental 2004, S.L.
Product codeNHA
Device classClass II
Decision dateDec 19, 2024
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation872.3630
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

IPD Dental Implant Abutments are components that attach to endosseous dental implants in the upper or lower jaw to support single or multiple tooth prosthetic restorations. The system includes titanium-based abutments (Ti Base Interface, Multi-Unit, and Overdenture designs), titanium screws with various coatings, and integrates with a digital dentistry workflow for designing and fabricating zirconia superstructures.

Technological characteristics

Subject device uses titanium alloy (ISO 5832-3) with TiN coating for abutments and screws, identical to the primary predicate. It includes three abutment categories (Ti Base Interface, Multi-Unit, Overdenture) compatible with 18+ commercial implant systems, with platform diameters ranging 3.0–5.7 mm and maximum angulation of 30°. The Ti Base workflow employs 3Shape Abutment Designer Software (K151455) and DD Bio Z zirconia (K142987), matching predicate specifications.

Test standards cited

ISO 17665-1 (sterilization validation to SAL 1×10⁻⁶), ISO 10993-5 (cytotoxicity), ISO 10993-10 (sensitization), ISO 10993-23 (irritation), ISO 14801 (static and dynamic fatigue testing), ISO 5832-3 (titanium alloy material specification), and FDA Class II Special Controls Guidance for endosseous dental implants and abutments.

Substantial equivalence argument

The subject device is substantially equivalent because it maintains identical intended use, materials (Ti alloy + TiN coating), sterilization methods, and fabrication processes as the primary predicate (K240570). Non-clinical testing demonstrates equivalent performance across all device categories. While the submission adds Multi-Unit and Overdenture abutment designs and expands compatible implant systems, these are design variations within the same functional category and do not introduce new safety or efficacy concerns; the digital workflow validation and fatigue testing confirm performance parity with predicate.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →