K-numberK242699
Device nameFlexible Ureteroscope (U-Scope)(2.8/1.2) (OMI161-2F28-CH12-US); Flexible Ureteroscope (U-Scope)(2.5/1.2) (OMI161-2F25-CH12-US); Images Systems (Camera-Controlled Unit) (OMI01M12)
ApplicantOpcom Medical, Inc.
Product codeFGB
Device classClass II
Decision dateMay 28, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation876.1500
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Flexible Ureteroscope (U-Scope) is a single-use, flexible digital video ureteroscope with a miniature CMOS camera and LED illumination, designed to visualize the urinary tract (urethra, bladder, ureter, calyces, renal papillae) via trans-urethral or percutaneous access to perform diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. It pairs with a reusable Images System (Camera-Controlled Unit) that processes and displays video images from the scope.

Technological characteristics

The subject device differs from the predicate (Uretero1™) in insertion tube outer diameter (2.5/2.8 mm vs. 2.98 mm), image sensor resolution (same 400×400), depth of field (5–50 mm vs. 2–50 mm), working hours (6 hours vs. 4 hours), and the Camera-Controlled Unit's LCD size (12.1 inches vs. 21.5 inches). Both share 400×400 resolution, 1.2 mm working channel, ethylene oxide sterilization, and compliance with IEC 60601 standards.

Test standards cited

IEC 60601-1:2005, IEC 60601-1-2:2014, IEC 60601-2-18:2009 (electrical safety and EMC); IEC 62471:2006 (photobiological safety); ISO 8600-3:2019, ISO 8600-5:2020 (field of view, resolution); ISO 10993-5, -10, -11, -23 and USP46:2023 (biocompatibility); ISO 11135:2014 (sterilization validation); ASTM D4332-22, ASTM D4169-22 (environmental conditioning and shipping simulation).

Substantial equivalence argument

Although the subject device differs from the predicate in insertion tube diameter, depth of field, working hours, and LCD size, these differences do not raise new safety or effectiveness questions because the subject device has demonstrated equivalent or superior performance through comprehensive mechanical, optical, electrical, biocompatibility, and sterilization testing. Both devices share the same indications for use, working channel diameter, image resolution, sterilization method, and regulatory compliance standards, establishing technological similarity sufficient for substantial equivalence.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →