K-numberK242597
Device nameCROSSLEAD 0.018inch
ApplicantAsahi Intecc Co., Ltd.
Product codeDQX
Device classClass II
Decision dateMar 5, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation870.1330
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The CROSSLEAD 0.018inch is a steerable guide wire with a maximum diameter of 0.46mm, available in lengths of 100-300 cm. It is intended to direct a catheter to desired anatomical locations in the peripheral vasculature (excluding coronary and cerebral vessels) during diagnostic or interventional procedures. The device consists of a hybrid nitinol and stainless-steel core with coils, coated with hydrophilic, polyurethane, and PTFE materials for lubricity.

Technological characteristics

The subject device differs from the predicate (Gladius Mongo18 PV ES) in outer coil structure and core shaft structure. Both share the same nominal outer diameter (0.46mm/0.018 inch), similar material composition (Ni-Ti/stainless-steel core, stainless steel and Pt-Ni coils), identical coating types (hydrophilic polyurethane and PTFE), and the same ethylene oxide sterilization method (SAL 10⁻⁶). The subject device offers additional usable lengths including 100cm.

Test standards cited

Not stated in this summary. The document references in vitro bench testing but does not cite specific ISO, IEC, ASTM, or other consensus standards by number or name.

Substantial equivalence argument

Substantial equivalence is established because the subject device and predicate share identical intended use (peripheral vascular catheter guidance) and substantially similar technological characteristics including materials, coatings, sterilization, and operating principles. Non-clinical laboratory testing (tensile strength, torque, flexibility, coating integrity, corrosion resistance, dimensional verification, and biocompatibility) demonstrated the subject device met all acceptance criteria and performed similarly to predicate and reference devices. The technological differences in outer coil and core shaft structure do not raise different safety or effectiveness questions because bench testing showed comparable performance profiles.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →