K-numberK242580
Device nameUnimed Reusable Finger Clip SpO2 Sensors (U103-125); Unimed Reusable Finger Clip SpO2 Sensors (U403-254); Unimed Reusable Finger Clip SpO2 Sensors (U103-254); Unimed Reusable Finger Clip SpO2 Sensors (U403-125)
ApplicantUnimed Medical Supplies, Inc.
Product codeDQA
Device classClass II
Decision dateFeb 6, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation870.2700
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Unimed Reusable Finger Clip SpO2 Sensors are non-invasive pulse oximetry sensors that continuously monitor oxygen saturation (SpO2) and pulse rate in adult patients weighing >30 kg and pediatric patients weighing 10–50 kg. They are reusable finger-clip sensors compatible with Masimo Radical-7 monitors and are for prescription use only.

Technological characteristics

The subject devices use two-wavelength relative optical absorption (660 nm/905 nm LEDs) with a photodetector, cable, connector, and silicone finger-clip housing. Key changes from the predicate include a faster-responding photodetector, smaller finger-clip sizing for pediatric use (U103-125), and different connector types (M8 vs M10) to expand monitor compatibility, while maintaining identical material composition, SpO2 accuracy (±3%), and pulse rate accuracy (±3 bpm).

Test standards cited

IEC 60601-1:2005 (electrical safety), IEC 60601-1-2:2014+AMD1:2020 (EMC), ISO 80601-2-61:2017 (pulse oximeter requirements), ISO 10993-5 (cytotoxicity), ISO 10993-10 (skin sensitization), and ISO 10993-23 (skin irritation). Clinical validation per ISO 80601-2-61 and FDA guidance via hypoxia testing in adult volunteers with darkly pigmented subjects.

Substantial equivalence argument

The devices maintain identical operating principles, materials, performance specifications (SpO2 ±3%, PR ±3 bpm), environmental tolerances, and biocompatibility to the predicate device K142832. Although the subject submission narrows the patient population (removing neonates <3 kg and adults 30–40 kg), restricts to finger-only sites, and covers only reusable variants, these changes represent a subset of the predicate's intended use rather than expansion into new risk domains. The photodetector and connector modifications do not alter fundamental safety or effectiveness; clinical testing confirms accuracy equivalence. Therefore, the same intended function and principle of operation, supported by equivalent test data, establishes substantial equivalence.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →